Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
abdoeng said:hi, from my iterations in cst and xfdtd ,they have the same accuracy but
1-cst has more saving time than xfdtd
2- cst easy to make simulation than xfdtd
3- cst has adaptive meshing automatically but xfdtd not
4- cst has easy far field rather than xfdtd
5- cst automatically adjust the time step to avoid instability
at all,i repffered xfdtd and cst for antenna simulation
regards
i already have cst2006b,xfdtd 6.3.8.4Aiiar said:abdoeng
for what versions you give this comparison ??
Added after 11 minutes:
is cst based on MOM or FDTD ??????!!
mpero said:Dr Nikken
You must be working for Motor** to be using SEMCAD. I say so cuz its quite the only customer SEMCAD has all over the world.
But on the other way round, check on how many customers CST has - even better, look at how many questions on EDABOARD regard to CST, how many relate to SEMCAD.
SEMCAD's interface looks pre-historical compared to any other professional EM tool on the market. I dont know what kind of application you couldnt get done with CST that its only possible with SEMCAD. Maybe you lack experience with CST, I bet.
peace
mpero
Dear all,
recently I have been working on simulations of Through the Wall radar scenarios in CST (simulations of room with objects like pieces of furniture and human body phantoms inside, plus some radar structures outside the wall; these simulations must be performed at UWB frequencies like 1-5GHz).
My license for CST is going to expire soon and we were thinking if it is worth renewing it or switching to xFDTD.
Any good piece of advice is more than welcomed.
Thanks