Can we achive get_next_item without TLM Port

Thread starter jdshah
Start date Feb 2, 2016

Status: Not open for further replies.

Feb 2, 2016

jdshah

Junior Member level 3

This may be a silly question.
I am wondering why we can not connect driver and sequencer with out port, to implement get_next_item and item_done.
Like,

Code:

driver.connect(sequencer)

Code:

function connect(uvm_component m_comp);
m_comp = sequencer
endfunction

while we call

Code:

driver.get_next_item();

it will call

Code:

m_comp.get_next_item

can anyone please guide on this?

Status: Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
Port is not connected when using top module
- Started by Boris.b
- Jan 22, 2024
- Replies: 3
PLD, SPLD, GAL, CPLD, FPGA Design
A
I2C in PS of Zynq without AXI
- Started by aminpix
- May 4, 2023
- Replies: 4
PLD, SPLD, GAL, CPLD, FPGA Design
S
can one input clock port be connected to two MMCM for different frequency out?
- Started by skyworld_cy
- Dec 22, 2022
- Replies: 5
PLD, SPLD, GAL, CPLD, FPGA Design
A
How can I run verilog code with data at a specific time in the past?
- Started by alexis57
- Jan 28, 2024
- Replies: 2
PLD, SPLD, GAL, CPLD, FPGA Design
H
EEPROM communication without Arduino
- Started by Hassan Mohamed
- Jul 20, 2022
- Replies: 5
PLD, SPLD, GAL, CPLD, FPGA Design

Can we achive get_next_item without TLM Port

jdshah

Junior Member level 3

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency