Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Bob Pease Notes on Linear IC Design

Status
Not open for further replies.

danadakk

Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
3,107
Helped
414
Reputation
848
Reaction score
727
Trophy points
113
Activity points
13,451
Came across this browsing legacy National Semi Seminars and thought many of Bob's
insights still as relevant as a lot of work he did on Analog Circuit design are today.

I was fortunate enough in part of my career to sit a couple of desks away from him and not infrequently
talk to him about work I was doing.

Enjoy.

Regards, Dana.
 

Attachments

  • Bob Pease Linear IC Design Considerations.pdf
    457.8 KB · Views: 115
Were you around when he threw the computer from the top of the National building?
Because the SPICE simulation had “lied” to him.
 

Yes but not at the actual event.

Had once a conversation with him and Jim Williams (who hated math, LaPlace analysis)
that Spice would eventually model correctly. Even though manufacturers purposely
releasing incomplete models to mask proprietary innovation. Still a problem today
I think. Good example of that is RR input OpAmps where the crossover behavior is
not modeled. EG distortion numbers will be off.

My discussion with them was coming off an experience where as a production engineer
I wrote a Fortran program to analyze yields and wafer ET data, and later test machine results.
In that activity my boss was against computers, and I had to do this at night. Upon com-
pletion I presented results that led to process changes and fab investigations that ultimately
improved yields. On the test side I found a machine that consistently had issues, that resulted
in a > $ 1M pop in revenue for the month for fallout parts I was stashing under my desk. Recovered
most of them because of repaired tester results. I was dinged for having all thes parts under my
desk. Discouraging so much resistance to change by fellow engineers. Later as a field engineer I
saw that on a regular basis at various accounts, some EEs not able to move with technology.

I was in central applications at the time of spice discussion. My boss there hugely progressive.
Jim Moyer. He had a friend, Dale Mrazek, inventor of Tri State and lead manager on National
2900 bit slice, and Barry Siegal, manager hybrid linear ICs (high performance stuff), and I would
get to go on lunches with them occasionally. Kept my mouth shut and learned tons. Dumb luck
to be surrounded by folks like this. The one person I missed (in my opinion) more contact with was
Tom Frederiksen , great insight (his books reflected that) into semiconductor physics and
IC design.


Regards, Dana.
 
Last edited:

Yes, Tom Frederiksen 's book on intuitive opamps was really an eye opener for me back when I was pretty much fresh out of the university. Great book, I went through it in about a week and was a god basis to built up from there.
 

His books https://archive.org/details/intuitiveicopamp00fred

Others -

1617138529484.png



Regards, Dana.
 
Last edited:
Dana;
You worked at National during its glory days.

I also have a pair of Tom’s books. Bob Pease’s hilarious introduction to the OpAmp book is priceless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top