Mantle279
Newbie level 1
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 1,281
- Activity points
- 1,293
Hi edaboard,
I am looking at RF ADCs; the trouble is, I am a digital type with an appreciation for analog.
I am looking at the datasheet for an Intersil KAD5512P-25 ADC. https://www.intersil.com/content/dam/Intersil/documents/kad5/kad5512p.pdf
They provide several specifications on SFDR and SNR as a function of analog input frequency. However the device itself has a peak conversion rate of 250MSPS.
The question I have is: why specify an analog input frequency that goes up to 1GHz is the conversion rate is only 250MSPS? This is not a block converter. I think it has to do with the RF front-end and how well the filtering is before the A/D. Is that the right idea? So you could have a fairly wide simple LPF with a roll-off of 20dB/decade, but the ADC will filter it further per Nyquist. Or you could have a fairly complex filter at the front end with a steeper roll-off. The benefit is that this improves your SNR and SFDR, but the cost is increased complexity at the front-end.
Is that the right idea?
Thanks
I am looking at RF ADCs; the trouble is, I am a digital type with an appreciation for analog.
I am looking at the datasheet for an Intersil KAD5512P-25 ADC. https://www.intersil.com/content/dam/Intersil/documents/kad5/kad5512p.pdf
They provide several specifications on SFDR and SNR as a function of analog input frequency. However the device itself has a peak conversion rate of 250MSPS.
The question I have is: why specify an analog input frequency that goes up to 1GHz is the conversion rate is only 250MSPS? This is not a block converter. I think it has to do with the RF front-end and how well the filtering is before the A/D. Is that the right idea? So you could have a fairly wide simple LPF with a roll-off of 20dB/decade, but the ADC will filter it further per Nyquist. Or you could have a fairly complex filter at the front end with a steeper roll-off. The benefit is that this improves your SNR and SFDR, but the cost is increased complexity at the front-end.
Is that the right idea?
Thanks