Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

A very simple Hspice question

Status
Not open for further replies.

sgharagoz

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
30
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,458
Hi guys,

I have got a very simple netlist that I trying to simulate in Hspice:


MN1 VCC Gat 0 0 CMOSN L=360n W=360n
VDD VCC 0 DC 1.8
Vgs Gat 0 DC 1.43

.OP 1us

.END

The model used is 0.18micron TSMC. In the model K' is defined as (µCox/2) = 177.2uA/v² and Vth =0.43v.
Base on my circuit setting, I expect the MOSFET to be in saturation region and the drain current to about 177.2uA.

But operating analysis indicates that NMOS current is about 94.3uA
---------------------------
| Element | MN1 |
|------------+-------------|
| Model Name | CMOSN |
| region | Saturation |
| id | 9.4313e-005 |
| ibs | 0.0000e+000 |
| ibd | 0.0000e+000 |
| vgs | 1.4300e+000 |
| vds | 1.8000e+000 |
| vbs | 0.0000e+000 |
| vth | 4.3606e-001 |
| vdsat | 5.5645e-001 |
| beta | 3.4911e-004 |
| gam eff | 5.5635e-001 |
| gm | 1.4045e-004 |
| gds | 2.7543e-006 |
| gmb | 3.6982e-005 |
| cdtot | 2.8498e-016 |
| cgtot | 1.3682e-015 |
| cstot | 6.8866e-016 |
| cbtot | 2.1474e-016 |
| cgs | 1.0430e-015 |
| cgd | 2.8096e-016 |
|--------------------------|


Can anyone tell me why there is difference in my hand calculations and the actual value?

Thanks
 

erikl

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
8,112
Helped
2,685
Reputation
5,350
Reaction score
2,284
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Germany
Activity points
44,153
Your hand calculation probably didn't consider

  • channel-length modulation (CLM)
  • carrier velocity saturation (mobility reduction due to the longitudinal field)
  • vertical field mobility reduction (VFMR)
 

sgharagoz

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
30
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,458
Hi Erikl,

I don't think adding CLM would help me. In fact if I consider that, it will make the drain current even more than I calculated.
The velocity saturation is more plausible but I have used this model card before and I am very sure that hand calculation should be very close to the actual numbers.

Any other reason that could explain this?
 

Dominik Przyborowski

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
913
Helped
413
Reputation
826
Reaction score
403
Trophy points
1,343
Location
Norway
Activity points
6,834
By considering only a velocity saturation, the calculated drain current is equal to 101.7 µA. Hand calculation are very often close to reality but only if You are using a proper analytical model, not a square law long channel equation.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top