Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
But in this case your timing path should be calculated from negedge to posedge like this:
tPINV + tPFF + tXOR =< TW - tsu - T(high)
TW - T(high) >= 54
TW >= 54 + T(high)
why we need to count from negedge to psedge if we have the assumpations? Without assumpation and if without assumptions...
I don't know what is the relationship between %high clock with the minimum period.
Disregard the 2 assumptions,i get.
tPINV + tPFF + tXOR =< TW - tsu
12 + 14 +22 =< TW -6
TW >= 54
so what will change if we take the assumptions into account?
Determine the minimal clock period TW for the following circuit. Use the following delay values for the flip-flops and gates.
Flip-Flop: 5 ≤ tPFF ≤ 14ns; tsu = 6ns; th = 10ns
Inverter: 2 ≤ tPINV ≤ 12
XOR Gate: 7 ≤ tXOR ≤ 22
1.Work the problem under the assumption that the clock is
symmetrical...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.