Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
You should use probably a more dense mesh to simulate such problem in Mom( cells per wavelength>30, edge mesh on).
If you used adaptive meshing in HFSS and the convergence criteria was reached und most of all, you have correctly modeled, the results of HFSS will be more exact than that of MOM.
cst lumped element
Does anybody ever try to use the lumped element in the CST simulation?
I added a capacitor between two ports, and I got a total different result as if I export the Touchstone file at first and add it in a circuit simulator.
I really don't know why. Could someone help me...
I got two different resonance frequencies from two runs. I don't know,which one is more accurate.
Therefore my question is: if I want to get the most exact simulationresult between 2.3 and 2.6 GHz, how do I choose the meshing frequency and the freqency range of simulation?
Thanks!
Simulation with IE3D
I simulated a planar structure two times. At the first time from 2 to 3 GHz(meshing at 3 GHz) and the second from 2.3 to 2.6 GHz(meshing at 2.6 GHz). I get two reults, which are a lot different.
Could somebody tell me, which one is more accurate?
Thanks!
I couldn't agree more. But I don't like the EM simulator of Genesys or MWO because of its methode of meshing. I think IE3D is the best for planar structure by far.
Printed monople
Hi,has someone any expierence with simulation of a printed monopole?
I need a example project. It could be for IE3d,Momentum,Emseble,Ansoft HFSS or Microwave studio 3.
Thanks in advance! 8)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
