Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
It is usually seen that only verification jobs are moved out. So there is always shortage of communication in the projects, resulting in degrading quality. Probably sooner or later moving out only the verification activity may be stooped or probably the entire project might be moved away.
I think we need some common language and environment which can be used right from design phase to system level validation. ie, code the design in language X, develop the test environment in language X, interface that supports the usage of already developed test environment in language X to be...
But there is no fixed gate size for logic cells such as LUTS etc. It varies depending on the way it is used. So how can there be a fixed system gate count for a FPGA.
Xilinx are the best but do have lot of drawbacks compared to others. I tinnk altera is picking up but it may take quite sometime for them to overtake xilinx.
But that constraint will disable the use of the BUFG0.
My problem is that for a particular I do not want to use the clock routing. If I disable the use of BUFG0, it will take some other buffer.
How to avoid clk buffer
I am synthezing my design for Xilinx device. I find that one of my input signal which is not a clock is being through the global clk buffer. How can I force the synthesis tool to not use the clk buffer for this input.
If you don't mind could you give the details to change the dsplay settings. I remember struggling out with the xconfigurator once and was not able to do it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.