Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Possibly because the Er dieletric constant for FR4 varies widely. Teflon is used for high speed signals design, closely matched impedance control traces can be designed.
Guyaneseboy
It is probably just another way to claim superiority and justify a higher price. People who play golf will buy things on this basis also. It is the mechanical parts of the audio system (speakers and in old days phono pickups) that are the limiting factor in sound quality.
Do you remember the neverending story with the oxigen free copper cables?.
Among the other things (Lower resistance, clearer signal, lower distorsion, ecc ) they claim to conduct better in one direction than in the other and for this reason are polarized.
At my work this is a DIODE ( even very bad ) and of course the response in ac will not be better than the other cables.
One way to pay 10 the value of 1.
I also see no reason using teflon instead of FR-4! Every capacitor in the signal path will give much more distortion than a frequency-dependend er! (This frequency-dependeces are only interesting at some GHz).
So: use FR-4 and be happy with the much lower price!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.