Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

What is the difference between NPN and PNP bipolar transistor?

Status
Not open for further replies.
principle carriers in npn and pnp transistor

Please read
Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits (4th Edition) by Paul R. Gray, Paul J. Hurst, Stephen H. Lewis, and Robert G. Meyer
for more details
 

npn versus pnp

Mobility of holes is less than that of electrons .
So, NPN is faster than PNP
 

npn vs pnp transistors

itsthepip said:
Mobility of holes is less than that of electrons .
So, NPN is faster than PNP

I read it somewhere,
but ... a hole is some empty space (lack of electrons in a grid), where "normally" electron resides... and their moevement is nothing else but movement of electrons.... so how can there be a difference??
 

diff between pnp and npn

sarafcina said:
itsthepip said:
Mobility of holes is less than that of electrons .
So, NPN is faster than PNP

I read it somewhere,
but ... a hole is some empty space (lack of electrons in a grid), where "normally" electron resides... and their moevement is nothing else but movement of electrons.... so how can there be a difference??


i read it too. the explanation is also on that forum. in a phsicist's point of view, holes don't really move.

here's the link
 

npn vs pnp transistor

forkschgrad said:
sarafcina said:
itsthepip said:
Mobility of holes is less than that of electrons .
So, NPN is faster than PNP

I read it somewhere,
but ... a hole is some empty space (lack of electrons in a grid), where "normally" electron resides... and their moevement is nothing else but movement of electrons.... so how can there be a difference??


i read it too. the explanation is also on that forum. in a phsicist's point of view, holes don't really move.

here's the link


thanks for the link... I meant I read it in some ... "old dusty book" ...

anyway according to Dirac's theory of what are the holes ... how is it possible that holes are slower (or anyhow different in sense of movement)?
 

pnp vs npn

Thanks to all for the wonderful answers given... really helped me..
 

pnp and npn in electronics in wikipedia

best book is Electronic circuit analysis & design by Donald A Neamen
 

pnp signal wikipedia

qpoint said:
best book is Electronic circuit analysis & design by Donald A Neamen

what does it say... which is best npn or pnp ;)
 

npn v pnp

sarafcina said:
qpoint said:
best book is Electronic circuit analysis & design by Donald A Neamen

what does it say... which is best npn or pnp ;)
npn is best because current is flow due to electron as electron mobility is getter than hole.
 

pnp npn simple explanation

i meant refering the book........
 

profile difference in pnp and npn

u can use wikipedia.org to make comparisation.
 

pnp vs. npn transistors

it's good to read wikipedia bu sometimes it's needed to read here because the idea came from different persons. wether engineers or physicists.
 

pnp or npn

u can refer any basic electronics book.
 

differences + pnp and npn

I think U want the difference in the application for each one ?
 

pnp vs npn transistor

in NPN majority carriers are electrons whereas in PNP the majority carriers are holes
 

npn pnp transistors

itsthepip said:
Mobility of holes is less than that of electrons .
So, NPN is faster than PNP


mobility of electrons is nine times faster than holes...Hence NPN is prevalant than PNP
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top