Alan0354
Full Member level 4
In page 17 and 18 of the article in the link:
http://www.antentop.org/009/files/tr009.pdf
There are two RHC antenna and the transmitting antenna is at the origin and the receiving antenna is in far field facing the origin. The link gave
\[\rho_w=\frac {\hat{\theta}\;-\;j \;\hat{\varphi}}{\sqrt{2}}\]
But the article said the receiving antenna has it's own coordinates \[ R_a\; \theta_a , \varphi_a\], and said the propagation direction from the transmitting antenna is in direction of \[-\hat{R}_a\] and
\[\rho_a=\frac {\hat{\theta}\;+\;j \;\hat{\varphi}}{\sqrt{2}}\]
1) Is the change from -ve to +ve sign in the \[j \;\hat{\varphi}\] due to the propagation direction of \[-\hat{R}_a\] referencing to the receiving antenna?
http://www.antentop.org/009/files/tr009.pdf
There are two RHC antenna and the transmitting antenna is at the origin and the receiving antenna is in far field facing the origin. The link gave
\[\rho_w=\frac {\hat{\theta}\;-\;j \;\hat{\varphi}}{\sqrt{2}}\]
But the article said the receiving antenna has it's own coordinates \[ R_a\; \theta_a , \varphi_a\], and said the propagation direction from the transmitting antenna is in direction of \[-\hat{R}_a\] and
\[\rho_a=\frac {\hat{\theta}\;+\;j \;\hat{\varphi}}{\sqrt{2}}\]
1) Is the change from -ve to +ve sign in the \[j \;\hat{\varphi}\] due to the propagation direction of \[-\hat{R}_a\] referencing to the receiving antenna?