Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Better? It would be meaningful to compare FDTD based software with other FDTD based softwares. And it would be meaningful to compare softwares in terms of applications. I would say SEMCAD X is better than CST and XFDTD in terms of, for example, speed, handling of complex structures (size of computational domain, number of objects), grid generation, optimization, etc. In terms of applications for example, HFSS is strong in some areas where SEMCAD X (or other time domain solvers) is not efficient in terms of simulation time.
Please check their web pages to see the differences. You can ask for a demo CD and test it yourself.
Best wishes,
freqzt said:
Is it true that semcadx better than cst, xfdtd, hfss, and zeland?
What is the different between semcadx with others?
hi.... I am just starting new with SEMCAD X and would be immensely helpful if anyone could upload or send some tutorials to the mail a123priya@gmail.com
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
