Opinions on Panda Zeni performance

[dragonwell]

[discuss] panda zeni

Hi all,

we are making an evaluation on zeni. however, i am not familiar with this software, just drawn some simple schematics but found that the short-cut key or some functions do not work properly, eg. "+" "z" for zoom in don't work.

Who have experienced with it? Can you compare it with LEdit?

Thx a lot!

Dragonwell

 

[rfsystem]

Re: [discuss] panda zeni

I am interessted too. Seems to be a cadence icfb clone. Do you test a newer release. I only have advertisement 2 years old!

 

[qliu]

[discuss] panda zeni

we have just finished the evaluation on zeni,the new
version put forward in Sep.
zeni is similar with cadence icfb.
but its bacK-end design verification only supports Dracula command style.

 

[rfsystem]

Re: [discuss] panda zeni

Is the support of external simulators better than in icfb? We have issues integrating nonCadence into AnalogArtist. So backanotation/crossprobing is supported to who?

 

[dragonwell]

Re: [discuss] panda zeni

we have just finished the evaluation on zeni,the new
version put forward in Sep.
zeni is similar with cadence icfb.
but its bacK-end design verification only supports Dracula command style.

doesn't it have its own verification tool? like zeni veri?
how about the interface for pre- & post-layout simulation?

Added after 48 seconds:

i also worry about the technical support.

 

[aba380]

Re: [discuss] panda zeni

Hi all,

we are making an evaluation on zeni. however, i am not familiar with this software, just drawn some simple schematics but found that the short-cut key or some functions do not work properly, eg. "+" "z" for zoom in don't work.

Who have experienced with it? Can you compare it with LEdit?

Thx a lot!

Dragonwell

can you share your evaluational license file for me
I have installed this software,but have no license to run it.
my email address is zzj0329@hotmail.com,thanks!