wesspower
Junior Member level 1
Please see the attachment for more detail about the circuit and problem.
I believe I use 1.6 micro technology (spice model from University).
Here is the spice model for nmos and pmos transistor :
simulator lang=spice
.model nmos nmos
+ level=1 vto=1 kp=16u gamma=1.3 lambda=0.01
+ phi=0.7 pb=0.80 mj=0.5 mjsw=0.3 cgbo=200p cgso=350p cgdo=350p
+ cj=300u cjsw=500p ld=0.8u tox=80n
.model pmos pmos
+ level=1 vto=-1 kp=8u gamma=0.6 lambda=0.02
+ phi=0.6 pb=0.50 mj=0.5 mjsw=0.25 cgbo=200p cgso=350p cgdo=350p
+ cj=150u cjsw=400p ld=0.8u tox=80n
I am not sure that does id support to behave like that.
if I set the width and length to minimum width ( in this technology, it is any value which is above 1.60, therefore I set 1.61.
In the experiment , I set Vdrain = 2 Volt , and Vgate = 2 Volt , and do parameter analysis(in this case, both width and length from 1.61 to 4 , the width and length always keep in 1) , and plot the id graph
please comment your thought and theory . Thank you
I believe I use 1.6 micro technology (spice model from University).
Here is the spice model for nmos and pmos transistor :
simulator lang=spice
.model nmos nmos
+ level=1 vto=1 kp=16u gamma=1.3 lambda=0.01
+ phi=0.7 pb=0.80 mj=0.5 mjsw=0.3 cgbo=200p cgso=350p cgdo=350p
+ cj=300u cjsw=500p ld=0.8u tox=80n
.model pmos pmos
+ level=1 vto=-1 kp=8u gamma=0.6 lambda=0.02
+ phi=0.6 pb=0.50 mj=0.5 mjsw=0.25 cgbo=200p cgso=350p cgdo=350p
+ cj=150u cjsw=400p ld=0.8u tox=80n
I am not sure that does id support to behave like that.
if I set the width and length to minimum width ( in this technology, it is any value which is above 1.60, therefore I set 1.61.
In the experiment , I set Vdrain = 2 Volt , and Vgate = 2 Volt , and do parameter analysis(in this case, both width and length from 1.61 to 4 , the width and length always keep in 1) , and plot the id graph
please comment your thought and theory . Thank you