Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Difference between STI and LOCOS

Status
Not open for further replies.

raj_007

Newbie level 4
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,314
Hi,

Please can anyone answer why STI is preferred instead of LOCOS in mosfet.


Thanks
 

LOCOS is a classical oxidation process, steam or dry. It
can't be patterned especially fine and can't go deep or at
high aspect ratio.

A trench etch with either a refill or a sidewall reox can be
cut finer and deeper, enabling better isolation* and packing

* the quality of oxide surface being critical

The preference is stronger as you challenge active-active
spacings, and as those spacings (rather than intradevice
dimensions) begin to dominate functional packing density.
However LOCOS still has huge cost advantages where it
will work - I am familiar with some FDSOI technologies
where the very thin film makes LOCOS perfectly viable
because the aspect ratio is low (<0.1um film, 1um active-
active spacing). If you wanted a 0.5um deep isolation
and a 0.2um active-active, though, you'd have no choice
but STI.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top