Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Boolean Algebra

Status
Not open for further replies.

sxy

Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2022
Messages
5
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
34
Hi
Why the folllowing equation is correct:
L'C+I'C+L'I=L'C+L'I
thanks
 

Did you try put these terms into the K-map ?
There you can find out what terms can be simplified.
 

Hi
Why the folllowing equation is correct:
L'C+I'C+L'I=L'C+L'I
thanks
Using consensus theorem (XY + X'Z + YZ = XY + X'Z)
let L' = X
let C = Y
let I = Z

Hence your expression becomes:
XY + Z'Y + XZ
rearrange as XZ + YZ' + XY

Hence based on above theory XY is redundant:
= XZ + YZ'
i.e. = I'C + L'I

So either I or you may have typing error.
 

Using consensus theorem (XY + X'Z + YZ = XY + X'Z)
let L' = X
let C = Y
let I = Z

Hence your expression becomes:
XY + Z'Y + XZ
rearrange as XZ + YZ' + XY

Hence based on above theory XY is redundant:
= XZ + YZ'
i.e. = I'C + L'I

So either I or you may have typing error.
Hi
If you do the truth table for every side of the equation;
you will see that they are equal to each other; but I didn't succed to prove in in the terms of Boolean Algebra.
thank you very much for your answer.
 

As already said by std_match in post #2 the equation can't be correct. If you need an example simply let: I=0, C=1 and L=1 then LHS we have

0*1 + 1*1 + 0*0 = 1

RHS, intstead

0*1 + 0*0 = 0

Thus RHS <> LHS

Possibly your equation contains a typo, please check it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top