Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Beamformer Circuit

Per-channel phase shifters and variable gain blocks, each with fine
grained settings and a good, stable match between both on-chip
and neighbor-chip channels. Every element of the panel needs to
be accurately "aimed".

You are probably looking mostly at digital delay / phase shifters
(switched-LC) and digital step attenuators (switched-R or switched-C)
with some gain / buffer blocks.
 
I'm not recommending either way, but believe that
managing a large panel by analog signals (which in
the end will still be made digitally) will be much more
of a noise sensitive wireball. That in fact was the old
way. Layers behind the panel with the phase / amplitude
stuff and MxN independent feed wires to the MxN panels
(or maybe 2xMxN if the TX and RX go by different wires
to / from the on-element circulators).

Nowadays a commutated RF switch may replace the
circulator, and local gain / phase control lets elements
share a common feed and serial bus for great savings
in copper and structural weight.

Switches and passives will be much more stable in
hostile environments, than a "Vtune for gain and
Vtune for phase". Analog "might" do better for fine
resolution, but if that ends up "in the noise" for
"that sure is a big ball of unintended antennae"
then digital stays clean a lot better. Especially if you
keep a discipline of not chattering a bunch of serial
data during time-of-flight-and-return.

I'm not a radar guy but I've done 4 element-control chips
for space radars, over the years. Now you know what I
know, about the bigger picture.
 

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top