Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Severe nonlinearity of Cds in enhancement HEMT FET?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mtwieg

Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
3,835
Helped
1,310
Reputation
2,626
Reaction score
1,405
Trophy points
1,393
Activity points
29,372
Recently I've been using GaN FETs in amplifiers, and have found that some of them have extremely nonlinear drain-source capacitance, while others do not. For example, here are two plots from two similar devices (roughly same size, Rdson, Qg, etc).

First, the EPC1013:

The curve of Coss (the red curve) for this one is severe, but not terribly surprising.

And second, the EPC2012:

The nonlinearity here is much more extreme, and I can't think of any physical reasons to explain it. I'm wondering if it's due to different gate shielding, or to overlapping of the gate and drain/source terminals, but it's been a while since I've studied HEMT physics, and even then we never discussed nonlinearity.

I'm not a semiconductor designer, but I'm still very curious what the explanation for this behavior is. Any thoughts?
 

The Cdg ought to drop for a while as the drain junction
pushes back from the gate, but will eventually flatline
when the metallization fringing capacitance becomes all
that's left.

With these FETs perhaps representng different generations,
perhaps that corner is just off the chart for the EPC1013,
or the device's useful Vds range ends before that corner.

That, or the modeling dude did a sloppy fit on one or the
other.
 
The Cdg ought to drop for a while as the drain junction
pushes back from the gate, but will eventually flatline
when the metallization fringing capacitance becomes all
that's left.
Right, I expect Cds to drop off in an inverse square root manner to some flat minimum value as the depletion region grows, but that's not what it looks like.
With these FETs perhaps representng different generations,
They are, but as far as I know the main difference is that the EPC2012 is RoHS compliant.
perhaps that corner is just off the chart for the EPC1013,
or the device's useful Vds range ends before that corner.
Each plots shows the full range for the device, up to Vdsmax.
 

Each plots shows the full range for the device, up to Vdsmax.

Right, my point being that maybe in this generation breakdown
(or degraded reliability) comes before the capacitance has
reached its fringing asymptote.
 

Right, my point being that maybe in this generation breakdown
(or degraded reliability) comes before the capacitance has
reached its fringing asymptote.
Yes, that could be the case. But what I'm more interested in is the huge drop in the Cds of the EPC2012 at around 15V. I don't think that can be explained merely by lengthening of depletion regions.

Looking through the literature, the manufacturer seems to address this briefly in one of their white papers (page 4):

These capacitances are a function of the voltage applied to various terminals. Figure
8 shows how the values change as the voltage from drain to source increases. The
reason for the drop in capacitance as VDS goes up is that the free electrons in the GaN
are depleted away. For example, the initial step down in COSS (Output capacitance)
is caused by the depletion of the 2DEG near the surface. Further increase in VDS extends
the depletion region deeper into the body of the device thus increasing the
distance between the plates of the capacitor.

So I guess I can see how the 2DEG itself being depleted would cause a large change, but I don't see why some devices have a much more abrupt drop in Cds than in others.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top