Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[Help]CMOS comparator design questions.

Status
Not open for further replies.

wandola

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
31
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,554
Hello All,

I have some questions about cmos comparator design.

I need to design a very low power comparator. The Vdd = 3.3V, Midband Gain ~55dB, GBW ~500KHz. The current needs to be as small as possible.

I plan to put the differential pair in subthreshold region and the rest of the transistors in strong inversion or moderate inversion.

My architecture is samilar to a conventional 2-stage design. 1st stage is a PMOS current source. Then there is a PMOS differential pair. Below are NMOS load/current mirrors. 2nd stage is following the 1st stage by a wilson current mirrow. It is a cascode structure with 2 PMOS on top.

I have the following questions.
(1). How to determine the gain bandwidth of a comparator? Since comparator is not compensated...

(2). For my 0.18um process, the minimum transistor width is 220nm. So when I try to set the biasing current to about 300nA and I set my PMOS in saturation (Vgs = 500mV, Vth ~ 450mV), I get a W/L ~0.6.

Then I have to set the W/L = 300n/500n.

Is it acceptable in analog circuit design??

(3). For the NMOS active load devices, in order to bias them in saturation, I also have to make W/L < 1 since the current is very small...

So will this be okay??

thanks for the help.
 

wandola said:
(1). How to determine the gain bandwidth of a comparator? Since comparator is not compensated...
Standard ac simulation

wandola said:
(2)... Then I have to set the W/L = 300n/500n.
Is it acceptable in analog circuit design??

(3). For the NMOS active load devices, in order to bias them in saturation, I also have to make W/L < 1 since the current is very small...
So will this be okay??
Sure; why not?
 

Sorry for the first question,

What I mean is that how to consider the GBW in the design? Or, how to obtain a mathematical representation for the GBW in comparator design??

I know i can obtain the GBW through ac sim. what I mean in the design factor.

Thanks for your help.

Ciao
 

GBW practically don't have meaning for comparator.
Typically in spec a delay time for X [mV] input signal is used,- delay is strongly dependent from input signal value.
DC gain is auxiliary parameter,- for comparator 1e3 or 1e7 have a small influence in typical application, You should to provide necessary minimum, defining number of gain stages.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top