Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
I used a trick , use 2 new variable that it's 16 bit and and use the bit sign + 15 lower bit of all array of matrics :
sum <= sum + x_reg(mm,kk);
x_sum(15) <= sum(31) ;
x_sum(14 downto 0)<= sum(14 downto 0) ;
and use (x_sum) instead matrix
the number that i used , could show just by 15 bit , i didn't need another bit .
by the way if i need more just i can used 32 bit or 64 bits , and did same job as i did it for assurance , it means i changed all inputs and output to 32 bit . and when new variable (x_sum) that i used it's 64 bit then i used lower 31 bit and sign bit just for assurance .
and worked , i get wright answer .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
