Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Recent content by saq_kaleem

  1. S

    [SOLVED] A modeling problem in CST thermal solver

    yes, my problem is solved. you have to be careful with the time-duration you allow the simulator to run. Therefore, use sufficiently large time span to allow heating and cooling e.g. use 60e9 for 1min real situation if your unit scale is set is nanosec.
  2. S

    [SOLVED] A modeling problem in CST thermal solver

    Hi, I wanted to evaluate heat/temperature distribution on a ceramic substrate, bearing some MW integrated circuits, structures, and DC lines. The temperature distribution due to DC and MW signals can be seen with a MW and thermal co-simulation and looks fine to me. The DC and MW signals pass...
  3. S

    Phase Difference in CST

    You can also think about two effects 1) phase difference of two phasors 2) phase of the difference of two phasors
  4. S

    Phase Difference in CST

    CST displays phase with wrap/unwrap by default which can be turned off by un-checking this property when you will go to the plot properties. However, in CST2012, unlike its predecessor straight forward function to get phase of S21 is not possible, like we normally do in ADS etc. May be you can...
  5. S

    [SOLVED] ADS file open problem

    Hi, I am trying to open ADS2011 project (new way is to save in workspace) in ADS2009 (old way is to work with project). It looks this way is not backward compatible and I am not able to open a project from 2011 to 2009 but the reverse is OK. Can someone share his experience? regards, saqib
  6. S

    [SOLVED] A very basic problem?

    Thanks and appreciation for enjunear for sharing his reply. Actually, this problem could easily be solved by using following forumula derived from two-port network theory. R=50*2*(1/abs(S21)-1) 50 is only a normlization factor. regards, saqib
  7. S

    [SOLVED] A very basic problem?

    Is it possible to compute equivalent resistance at a particular frequency from given reflection and transmission coefficient? S11 -33.062dB S21 -0.049dB f 1GHz delay @1GHz 56.53psec regards, saqib
  8. S

    Compensation of Bond Ribbon and matching!

    Hi, I have been using two bond-ribbons to connect XYZ-chip to my dp951 LTCC module, which worked fine within limits. However, now when I tried to use only one ribbon, I am facing some problems. First the chip is manufactured with 40Ohm I/O impedance (found from measurements) while my desire is...
  9. S

    [SOLVED] Re: Simulation result, CST vs ADS

    Re: Simulation result, CST vs ADS The two results differ simply because the use two different EM simulation techniques. ADS MoM based on 3D planar EM technique considers substrate of infinite height while the real 3D FIT EM technique is the core kernel of CST.
  10. S

    Design simulation in ADS vs CST -Results are different!

    I would say either you use HFSS or CST, it doesnot yield a lot of difference in results. However, working with ADS, you should specify whether you used Analytical Models or Momentum designs. The Analytical results (if not properly taken into account other effects) are far from the results you...
  11. S

    A simple Microstrip simulation in ADS Momentum Vs CST

    Hi, Is it necessary to have similar S11 parameter of a 50Ohms Microstrip line if simulation is setup correctly in either CST, Mom or using ADS Analytical Models. My observation suggest the Analytical results to yield the best S11 curves, then MoM and then CST. But the behavior should nearly be...
  12. S

    Clear definition of Theoretical Probabilty of error for OOK

    ook noncoherent Now I think, you got my idea. The AWGN BER should be the lower limit of the simulated test bed. I used following equations for different situations: PPM coherent : Q[sqrt(Eb/N0)] OOK coherent : Q[sqrt(0.5*Eb/N0)] PPM non-coherent: 2Q[sqrt(Eb/N0)] OOK non-coherent...
  13. S

    Clear definition of Theoretical Probabilty of error for OOK

    you easily definitions of theoretical |TX|->|TxFilter+ |->|RxAntenna+|->|Receiver| |TxAntenna| |LowNoise Amplifier| |Channel+ | |RxFilter | |Noise + Interfernce| I have the same assumption like you made. I think lower bound is necessary only to...
  14. S

    Clear definition of Theoretical Probabilty of error for OOK

    error probability ook Actually, the equation you suggested me, seems to provide logical result for comparison purposes. But it generates another argument. The transmission of PPM using same pulse of amplitude A should also provide error probability equation as Pr=Q(Eb/N0). Does it mean both...
  15. S

    Clear definition of Theoretical Probabilty of error for OOK

    ook ber the ~3dB is due to the presence of real hardware components including multipath channel, tx and rx filters, low noise amplifiers and antenna gain patterns etc. so not a pure awgn cjannel and so will always have some implementation loss. (my thought)

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top