Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Recent content by radioCanada

  1. R

    impact factor of PIER Letters 2009 and 2010?

    HI, how can PIER have more than 3 if IEEE APS than e.g. 2.x Introduction by the Editor-in-Chief makes no sense! F.
  2. R

    Reciprocity of Antennas? Always? Some considerations t.b.d.

    Re: Reciprocity of Antennas? Always? Some considerations t.b .. half of the energy is reradiated ? I guess this is a missunderstanding. Half of what energy? The plane wave keeps ideally unlimited energy, and if the antenna is perfectly matched to the receiver network, why should half be...
  3. R

    Reciprocity of Antennas? Always? Some considerations t.b.d.

    Re: Reciprocity of Antennas? Always? Some considerations t.b Hi, thx for your answer. This does only partially answer my question. Let s assume the feeding network has an element providing S21=S12 , because it is passive, but S11= zero , however S22 is not entirely matched, so unzero. Now...
  4. R

    Reciprocity of Antennas? Always? Some considerations t.b.d.

    Hi all, You might all have read the chapters on antenna transmitting and receiving reciprocity, almost always explained via an easy dipole or horn antenna. Most of antennas are not that easy and especially Antenna Arrays with complex feeding networks will require - at my opinion - more...
  5. R

    Antenna Reciprocity : Let's consider and discuss a bit

    Hi all, You might all have read the chapters on antenna transmitting and receiving reciprocity, almost always explained via an easy dipole or horn antenna. Most of antennas are not that easy and especially Antenna Arrays with complex feeding networks will require - at my opinion - more...
  6. R

    Parametric Sweep in CST MWS

    hi, U should use MACRO - WIZARD - COMPARE MULTIPLE RUNS, but be sure - as the other user posted - that you have stored before all runs in cache, this is an option of the solver dialog box.
  7. R

    CST : Deembedding Discussion

    Hi Forum, deembedding in CST MWS 2009 is an easy way of getting the signal phase inside your structure. However, I observed some real issues with this tool: If you have a structure, (micro strip , waveguide, etc.) with two ports , in and out, and try to set the reference plance of both ports...
  8. R

    CST MWS: Parameter Sweep : 2 Parameters in one Sequence

    Hi there, still working hard on my antenna ;) , I was wondering HOW TO VISUALIZE THE RESULTS for a parameter sweep with more than one parameter? Can somebody give me a hint how plot more than the last run? I checked the "store in result cache" box, but do not understand where the results...
  9. R

    CST MWS : Parameter Sweep : Deembedding of S-paramater

    Again guys,... I have an issue with the CST parameter sweep: The deembedding feature in the Port dialogue, (reference plane) cancels the value after a parameter sweep, or better: during. I guess that only the first run is done WITH the modified reference plane and the subsequent are not. A...
  10. R

    CST MS : Parameter Sweep : Wrap Phase possible?

    Finally I hit on the following solution : Copy the entire result of the parameter sweep into a NEW FOLDER in the conventional S Parameter Result Folder and CST will do the wrap up job automatically for you. radiocanada
  11. R

    CST MS : Parameter Sweep : Wrap Phase possible?

    Hi there, does anybody know the same issue while performing parameter sweeps: The phase information of an S parameter is always unwrapped and the WRAP tool does not work in my case, even if the results are very close. For sure I could write a VBA script and search for the minimum phase etc...
  12. R

    CST: Two shapes "boolean added" together = Differe

    cst boolean Hello , I found a solution .. ;) Actually , if you are using 2009 and adding the objects together, you may still find the parameters within the common object, but on a deeper level. If you change one parameter it will be updated. I don't know why this didnt work before in my...
  13. R

    CST: Two shapes "boolean added" together = Differe

    www.edaboard.com ftopic359036 Hello group, my question regards CST MWS: What is your experience with CST when you simulate two shapes, e.g. perpendicular microstrips (T-junction, whatever..) alone and added together with the boolean operation "add". For sure, you' ill have different results...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top