Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Why we have to use a 6-metal process for RF?

Status
Not open for further replies.

yikwon1

Newbie level 5
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
8
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,340
I have some questions.
When we design the RF tranceiver, we usually use a 6-metal layer.

I slightly think that the reason is only inductor because inductor have to get
a high Q. is that right?

There are no methods to design for RF using 4-metal?

I'm wondering now.

Please give me some answers...

Thanks.
 

There are RF designs in 2 layer metal. I don't know why you would need 6
 

Why only 6? The more you have, the further is the inductor above the substrate, which is good.
 

The top metal and sometimes the top metal -1 layers are used for Inductors and MIM caps and usually use large minimum metal line widths as a consequence. So these layers cannot be used for dense metal routing.
This means RF designs suffer from restrictions on 2 metal layers. So the 6 layers comes from allowing 4 layers for dense interconnects.
Normally a Foundry will allow 6+ metal layers for RF as long as the last 2 layers conform to the larger min metal line widths and spacings.
To go lower than 6 say to 4 would mean you only have 2 dense metal layers to xork with. This might be OK for your design but could have other consequences.
As mentioned before, the inductor (and MIM) needs to be far enough away from the Si surface to guarantee performance.
Also, some foundries allow Active circuitry under pad. This can only be allowed if there is sufficient height above the circuitry before large stress (metal features) exist.
For RF, with large top metal features, 4 layers would not be enough.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top