Why atpg fault coverage is always 100%

Status
Not open for further replies.

Idatarm

Banned
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
0
Episoln \approx 0
Episoln *100/episoln \approx 0*100/episoln
Now lim rousing->0+
100 =0
Coverage =0+0=0+100=100
What do you think?
 

I don't recall ever seeing 100% test coverage, although it's
been a very long time since I cared.

How that formula is anything but theoretical, I am not seeing.
Looks to me like you can make epsilon anything you want,
until you start dealing with reality and just how acceptable
infinite iterations and run time are, when paid by the hour.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…