Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
I feel both are equal
since in DIT FFT we need to perform Bit reversal in the first step
where as in DIF FFT we have to perfom Bit reversal at the last step.
Regards
Robin
Added after 2 minutes:
However you can serach for some papers on DIT FFT and DIF FFT which may give results in terms of time taken to perform DIT FFT and DIF FFT for the same signals
and conclude something from that.
This depends on your application an memory available.
(1) If you plan to use the fft for ponly peak finding, you use FFT which does not require bitereversing. You dont even bitreverse the output. Just find the peak and use a LUT for reverse mapping.
(2) If you are using FFT for further operations You may want to bit reverse the input.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
