Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

What is Negative Frequency!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

nawabumar

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
24
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,485
negative frequency spins clockwise

here is a challenge for the gurus .i haven't been able to understand the concept of negative frequency so if anyone can elaborate it for me..

i am referring to the frequency spectrum of signals.

thanks in advance..
 

elmolla

Full Member level 2
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
132
Helped
20
Reputation
40
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,721
Hi,

The negative frequency is just a mathematical method of manipulating signal, in real life, no negative frequency is available, and if analysing any signal gives you a negative frequency it''ll just be mirrored to the positive frequency domain.

Simply, negative frequency is just a method of manipulating the signals mathematically, to obtain the real results, just mirror the negative frequency to be imposed on the positive part if due to a mirror
 

ciitv

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
21
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
1,463
The concept is pretty simple. Let me give you an analogy to demistify you. Consider you have have $10. Now this money can be represented as ($20)+(-$10)=$10. Now is there a -$10 currency ? Similarly a negative frequency combines with a positive frequency to give the actual frequency.
 

tkbits

Full Member level 5
Joined
Dec 4, 2004
Messages
242
Helped
39
Reputation
78
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,209
The only negative "frequency" value I can think of is a frequency OFFSET or difference.
 

echo47

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Apr 7, 2002
Messages
3,942
Helped
638
Reputation
1,274
Reaction score
89
Trophy points
1,328
Location
USA
Activity points
33,176
Negative frequency is a very real thing with complex (quadrature) signals. At any instant, the signal has X and Y components (or I and Q), and that's just a vector having some magnitude and phase. A positive frequency spins the vector counter-clockwise, a negative frequency spins it clockwise. Two signals at +100Hz and -100Hz are clearly different, just as 150Hz and 350Hz are clearly different. This is highly useful in many types of communication signal processing.

Think about the wheel on your car. It's useful to know that it's spinning at 100 rpm, but it's more useful to know whether it's spinning at +100 rpm or -100 rpm. The position of the valve stem (relative to the axle) would be the X and Y components of the complex signal.
 

IanP

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
7,942
Helped
2,310
Reputation
4,622
Reaction score
531
Trophy points
1,393
Location
West Coast
Activity points
66,416
> Can anyone explain the concept of Negative frequencies clearly. Do
> they really exist?

Here's the quick answer:

If you are expressing elements in frequency space as complex exponentials
(which is the kernel of the Fourier Transform) then to have sin(kt) or
cos(kt), you have to have the sum or difference of complex exponentials at
positive and negative frequencies.

So, the time domain cosine is a real sinusoid at a positive frequency.
But, in Fourier Transform spectral space, a real cosine is made up of
complex exponentials of equal amplitude at positive and negative equal
frequencies. You can find the identity in a trigonometry book of tables.

So, do they really exist? It depends on which domain you're looking at
them. In the time domain of real signals, I'd say no. In the frequency
domain, yes because of the observation above.
The rest of the discussion on this subject can be found at:
https://www.dsprelated.com/showmessage/22742/1.php

Regards,
IanP
 

ranjeeth

Newbie level 6
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
13
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Mumbai,India
Activity points
1,469
Consider this
sin (Wo) = (exp (j*Wo) - exp (-iWo))/2
cosine (Wo) = (exp (j*Wo)+- exp (-iWo))/2

By using fourier series/transformation we know complex signals (including real signals) can be represented in terms of summation/integration of compex exponentials.

So we can see that though a negative frequency can not be defined, for fourier signal representation we need to consider negative exponentials i.e. negative frequencies.

The above explanation can be visualised using a clockwise and anticlockwise phasor used to represent a sine wave.It is similar to e.g. of negative rpm mentioned somewhere above.
 

pixel

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
511
Helped
69
Reputation
138
Reaction score
16
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,992
When you determine transfer characteristics your poles and zeroes can be negative or positive, which have a great inmpact on circuit stability and other characteristics...
 

JoseLeonardo

Full Member level 1
Joined
Aug 9, 2004
Messages
96
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
767
You can read "Signals and Systems" by Oppenheim.
 

Naveed Alam

Full Member level 5
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
287
Helped
16
Reputation
34
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,250
in some communication processes -ve frequencies of real +ve frequencies develops..so -ve frequencies exists..
in frequency domain it apear with same amplitude but opposite to the original signal.
conjugate of your signal is also -ve frequency of the original signal...
 

Eric Best

Member level 4
Joined
Sep 3, 2001
Messages
78
Helped
25
Reputation
50
Reaction score
13
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,049
ranjeeth said:
sin (Wo) = (exp (j*Wo) - exp (-iWo))/2
cosine (Wo) = (exp (j*Wo)+- exp (-iWo))/2

To be more precise ;-) :

1)
either "i" or "j" should be used for the imaginary unit, not both in one expression

2)
sin(ωo) = [exp(jωo) - exp(-jωo)]/2j
cos(ωo) = [exp(jωo) + exp(-jωo)]/2
(not +-)

3) although physical signals can be represented by complex exponentials, the signals themselves are always real, i.e. the resulting expression (compound of complex components) has a pure real value.

Regards
Eric
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top