Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Via defining in ADS: cond1 and cond2 issue

Status
Not open for further replies.

ommumm

Member level 1
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
32
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
236
Via in @ds

In @ds there are three layers to define a via that are,hole,cond1 & cond2
cond1 is upper tranaitional metal Layer and cond2 is bottom transitional metal layer
I have defined cond1 as cond, but what should I define cond2
 

Via in @ds

Hi all,

About the via in ADS, I also have a problem:

when I use the VIA2(Cylindrical via hole in microstrip) in ADS, there is a range of usage: 100um<H<635um, if I want to set PCBoard height as 1.6mm. How to ensure the model's accuracy?or is there another method for substitute? Thanks!
 

Re: Via in @ds

ommumm said:
In @ds there are three layers to define a via that are,hole,cond1 & cond2
cond1 is upper tranaitional metal Layer and cond2 is bottom transitional metal layer
I have defined cond1 as cond, but what should I define cond2

In my design I have selected cond2 as cond.

/K
 

Re: Via in @ds

Since the Via goes to your ground in microstip cond2 layer is just cond, same as cond1, cond1 and cond2 have an affect if u using multilayer or overlapping layers.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top