Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Verilog State Machine

Status
Not open for further replies.

kingneb

Newbie level 3
Newbie level 3
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
3
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Visit site
Activity points
1,306
Hi,

I am fairly new to Verilog but have experience in VHDL. Here is a question that probably has a simple solution, but I am new and learn fast.

In the state machine, I have a module with two outputs.

Code:
module(
output DATA_REQUEST,
output RESULT_LOAD,
);
I receive an error when I attempt to assert or deassert the outputs directly in the state machine. I am missing something, and I know it is simple. Specifically, it is complaining the outputs are 'not of the register type'.

Code:
// Procedures.
always @(posedge CLOCK) 
begin : SEQUENTIAL // Sequential logic block.
    CURRENT_STATE <= NEXT_STATE;
end

always @(CURRENT_STATE)
begin : COMBINATORIAL // Combinatorial logic block.
    case (CURRENT_STATE)
        INITIAL:
            begin
                RESULT_LOAD <= 1'b0; // Errors result here.
                TIMER_RESET <= 1'b1; // Errors result here.
                T0 <= 24'd0;
                T1 <= 24'd1;
                ACCRUE_REG <= 24'd0;
            end
    endcase
end

Note for simplicity that the rest of the code is not shown.
 

In the state machine, I have a module with two outputs.

Code:
module(
output DATA_REQUEST,
output RESULT_LOAD,
);

make the outputs reg type.
Code:
module(
output [COLOR="#008000"][B]reg [/B][/COLOR]DATA_REQUEST,
output [COLOR="#008000"][B]reg [/B][/COLOR]RESULT_LOAD,
);
 

That does work but is there some "good practice" violation I am committing by doing that. Just a notion I have.
 

What I posted is valid Verilog 2001 coding. That is except for the comma after RESULT_LOAD which I left as I assume there were more inputs/outputs following that output.

You'll actually see a lot of texts showing the older coding style...

Code Verilog - [expand]
1
2
3
4
module xyz (a,b,c)
output a;
output b;
input c;



personally I don't like using the non-C like port syntax.
 

That does work but is there some "good practice" violation I am committing by doing that. Just a notion I have.

Well, you would be violating a good practice by NOT registering it. :p That being the good practice of registering your module outputs.

Another vote for the verilog 2001 style module declaration. Saves typing and makes your code more readable than the old school lets-repeat-things-34987345-times style.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top