Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Sinking or sourcing safety issues?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nora

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
115
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Location
My garage, USA
Activity points
2,292
allen bradley sinking sourcing opposite

Are there safety reasons why a board’s inputs would be designed as sourcing rather than sinking.
If a PLC had both options, would there be a reason to choose one rather than the other (besides that the inputting device goes in only one direction).
Thanks!
Nora
 

sinking and sourcing inputs allen bradley

Nora,

I think it's more a matter of the type of output the sensor you're using has, rather than a safety issue. As a side note, from another forum:

"Attention everybody.
The Mitsubishi definition of Sink/Source input is directly opposite to the Allen-Bradley's.
Mitsubishi defines input by being sinked or sourced by the sensor or contact.
AB defines input by being itself sinking or sourcing for connected external device.
As a result, our company just built a machine with sensors opposite to customers specification.
Our standard is Mitsubishi but this one was built on AB by cutomer's request.
Conclusion: always ask to specify NPN/PNP, not Sink/Source inputs.
By the way, Omron and Aromat do exactly this."

Ken
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top