Radiation power of antennas

Status
Not open for further replies.
H

htg

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
248
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Poland
Activity points
2,862
Widely known formulas for radiation power of antennas (e.g. short dipoles) have been derived using Lorentz gauge, which is mathematically convenient, but has no physical justification. I would like to know if these formulas agree at least up to an order of magnitude with the practically observed values.
 

Use an EM solver, solve a simple antenna and compute the radiated power and compare. EM simulators know nothing of Gauges or retarded potentials...they just crunch down on maxwell's equations or variants thereof, eg Helmholtz equation. Also, since many people have used these for antenna design where radiated power is of utmost concern, there is justification that you can use these for comparison of your analytic results.

hope this helps!

 

    H

    htg

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
How does an EM solver work? Does it use numerical methods that know nothing about the Lorentz gauge?
 

that is correct...the lorentz gauge is a simplification of representation of the Vector Potential. However, nearly all high frequency solvers solve in terms of the Electric fields explicitly rather than implicitly through the vector potentials. The exception may be in low frequency analysis where magnetic fields are of primary concern.

have fun
 

    H

    htg

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…