Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
In particular it improves the S11 for very much out of band signals, which can be important as most mixers IMD numbers are strongly influenced by termination impedance, and particularly when following the mixer with an immediate roofing filter the out of band termination can be all over the shop.
Sometimes the spurious responses are a bigger problem then system noise figure, so a couple of pads really help with broadband return loss.
Sometimes, attenuator before mixer is used to prevent mixer being saturated (i.e. reaching P1dB point). Generally, digitally controlled attenuators (DCA) were used for this purpose in which attenuation value can be controlled with respect to the power level that the system operates.
Think of the attenuators as providing isolation between the devices (in both directions). The one to the left of the mixer provides a slightly better match of the mixer's input (2 additional dB of RL) to components to the left of the mixer. But it also provides a better match for the mixer looking back (left) into those same components. Same on the output of the mixer.
So the mixer's output attenuator can appear to improve the S11 of the filter (especially for its out-of-band regions) that's to the right of the mixer (which is part of what Dan was pointing out I believe), making the mixer "happier".
I asked if it was for a simulation because often times the models for devices do not have a good enough representation of the real world so sprinkling attenuators around can help with the simulations. But sometimes the attenuators are also appropriate in a real design.
Think of the attenuators as providing isolation between the devices (in both directions). The one to the left of the mixer provides a slightly better match of the mixer's input (2 additional dB of RL) to components to the left of the mixer. But it also provides a better match for the mixer looking back (left) into those same components. Same on the output of the mixer.
So the mixer's output attenuator can appear to improve the S11 of the filter (especially for its out-of-band regions) that's to the right of the mixer (which is part of what Dan was pointing out I believe), making the mixer "happier".
I asked if it was for a simulation because often times the models for devices do not have a good enough representation of the real world so sprinkling attenuators around can help with the simulations. But sometimes the attenuators are also appropriate in a real design.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
