ruwan2
Member level 5
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2011
- Messages
- 90
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 1,286
- Activity points
- 2,141
Hi,
I am studying an equalizer which uses a lead-lag compensator after a high frequency attenuated distortion. At first, it seems quite simple: The equalizer emphasizes high frequency gain to make the total response flat at the high frequency part. When I try to get the total impulse response, I find that the impulse response of the lead-lag filter (nominator:[2.5e10, 1], denominator:[1.0e10, 1]) has a negative response. This is the first time I have a negative impulse response in contrast to the normal positive impulse response. I guess that it is because the high frequency pass feature.
The further problem is that the total impulse response of the low pass channel and the equalizer is still a negative impulse response. On the other hand, I do not see the equalized result has inversed the signal in the Simulink simulation model. How to explain the contradictory?
Please help me if you have the answer.
Thanks.
I am studying an equalizer which uses a lead-lag compensator after a high frequency attenuated distortion. At first, it seems quite simple: The equalizer emphasizes high frequency gain to make the total response flat at the high frequency part. When I try to get the total impulse response, I find that the impulse response of the lead-lag filter (nominator:[2.5e10, 1], denominator:[1.0e10, 1]) has a negative response. This is the first time I have a negative impulse response in contrast to the normal positive impulse response. I guess that it is because the high frequency pass feature.
The further problem is that the total impulse response of the low pass channel and the equalizer is still a negative impulse response. On the other hand, I do not see the equalized result has inversed the signal in the Simulink simulation model. How to explain the contradictory?
Please help me if you have the answer.
Thanks.