Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

PSRR improvement in BGR ckt

Status
Not open for further replies.

Safiya

Junior Member level 2
Junior Member level 2
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
22
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
3
Visit site
Activity points
0
hi,
My variation in bgr is 187uV with temp from -30 to 80C . is it acceptable? output is stable through out in transient and dc-response.
and my PSRR is -53dB. is the PSRR is enough or have to improve further , and how to improve ?
Thanks
Safiya
 

That depends on your requirement, but can you post the circuit and input /output levels?
 

First off, consider the problem of dynamic vs static PSRR.
Your bandgap is fed by something. Do you care if that
something's incoming ripple is passed unattenuated to
the destination?

For DC PSRR, 53dB is OK for DC accuracy goals on
a power management device; not OK for a data acq
reference beyond about 8-10 bits.

For RF applications you see people advertising 40dB
at 1MHz PSRRs, so the upstream switcher's ripple is
well-killed. That means a much higher DC PSRR.

The single easiest thing is to power the bandgap
from a local "poor boy" LDO regulator that has some
really good HF PSRR, maybe not fabulous (or even
regulated) DC accuracy. Like a low-VT NMOS
follower biased by a resistor/MOS diode stack and
decouple the heck out of its gate and source.
This makes vdd' a cleaner (AC-wise) power supply
and adds directly to your PSRR without messing the
bandgap itself around, any.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Safiya

    Safiya

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top