HPRF
Newbie level 4
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 7
- Helped
- 1
- Reputation
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
- Trophy points
- 3
- Activity points
- 0
Hi
I am reading through the proof for transmission line theory in Pozar and have a basic derivation step question that I am wondering if anyone can answer.
In the derivation Kirchoffs Voltage and Current laws are applied to give
V(z,t)-R*(delta)z*i(z,t)-L*(delta)z*(d/dt)i(z,t)-V(z+(delta)z,t)
for the voltage and something similar for the current.
The problem is that there is no explanation for where V(z+(delta)z,t) and I(z+(delta)z,t) go to when (delta)z-->0. They just seems to disappear from the derivation, without explanation, instead of cancelling with V(z,t) and I(z,t).
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
I am reading through the proof for transmission line theory in Pozar and have a basic derivation step question that I am wondering if anyone can answer.
In the derivation Kirchoffs Voltage and Current laws are applied to give
V(z,t)-R*(delta)z*i(z,t)-L*(delta)z*(d/dt)i(z,t)-V(z+(delta)z,t)
for the voltage and something similar for the current.
The problem is that there is no explanation for where V(z+(delta)z,t) and I(z+(delta)z,t) go to when (delta)z-->0. They just seems to disappear from the derivation, without explanation, instead of cancelling with V(z,t) and I(z,t).
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.