Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Power supply Ripple measurement problem

Status
Not open for further replies.

kumarghz

Member level 5
Member level 5
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
85
Helped
10
Reputation
20
Reaction score
7
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Penang, malaysia
Visit site
Activity points
1,938
Hi,
I have to automate the measurement of the ripple as indicate between the 'cursor 1' and 'cursor 2' in the figure below.
The ripple is measured by taking the Vp-p. The 'cursor 1' and 'cursor 2' has to be leveled manually. However, we need to automate this for the mass production testing. When automated, the scope measures the Vp-p(max) where it actually measures the switching transient which is very high. You can notice the high switching transients in the figure below.

Do you have any idea on how I can measure the ripple by ignoring the transients. I tried to set the filter BW to 20MHz but it doesn't helps much to suppress the transients.
Please help.

ScreenHunter_13 Oct. 11 12.01.jpg
 

At first sight, you are missing a clear specification of "ignoring the transients". Obviously there must be an algorithm or calculaton scheme to derive the value.

Although a statistics text book can suggest you a lot of suitable algorithms, your oscilloscope probably won't support it. On the other hand, if you try to find a technical reasoning behind the ripple measurement criterion, a Vpp value of the low-pass filtered seems to make much more sense.
 

According to the 45 kHz ripple frequency, the low-pass filter should have a 100 kHz to 1 MHz cut-off frequency.
 

Using one of the BW limit options might clean it enough
to get repeatable. Otherwise, consider using an applied
discrete filter like these guys mention, an "amplitude"
'scope function which tends to ignore spikes (check the
docs) or maybe a true-RMS (AC coupled). For purposes
of acceptance testing it's probably enough to get to a
repeatable screen for "normal", and fit the limits to the
population, and not essential to get the last little bit
of absolute accuracy.

I'd start with looking at the 'scope "measure" functions
list and see what that holds for you.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top