Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Performance of the PGS (simulating in HFSS)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hyao89

Newbie level 3
Newbie level 3
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Visit site
Activity points
27
HFSS simulation

hello experts,

Can anyone tell me the difference of the solution type Driven terminal and Driven modal? Thank you in advance!

Hyao
 
Last edited:

From HFSS help file:
Modal
For calculating the mode-based S-parameters of passive, high-frequency structures such as microstrips, waveguides, and transmission lines which are "driven" by a source, and for computing incident plane wave scattering. Network Analysis is the default and functions as before. Composite Excitation provides a method for solving fields in a large frequency domain problem.

Terminal
For calculating the terminal-based S-parameters of passive, high-frequency structures with multi-conductor transmission line ports which are "driven" by a source.
This solution type results in a terminal-based description in terms of voltages and currents. Some modal data is also available. Network Analysis is the default and functions as before.
Composite Excitation provides a method for solving fields in a large frequency domain problem.

I use modal for single signal models and terminal if there's more than one signal line, such as differetial pairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hyao89

    Hyao89

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top