Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

PCB copper layer without solder resist gives copper oxidisation risk?

Status
Not open for further replies.

grizedale

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
838
Helped
17
Reputation
34
Reaction score
17
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
8,804
Hello,

I just noticed on a competitor product today, that they have three 500mA LEDs in series on a ~0.8mm PCB with numerous thermal vias to the back copper layer, which is thermal padded to the aluminium heatsink.

The strange thing was that the back copper layer of the PCB was *bare* copper, with no solder resist over it.

-I thought as well as repelling solder, the solder resist layer was there to protect the copper from oxidising?

-So why has this company got bare copper on the back of the PCB?......surely it may react with the chemical of the thermal pad?

-It seems probable that they have neglected to add solder resist in order to get better thermal transfer from the LEDs to the heatsink, but surely that thin, skinny layer of solder resist doesn't hamper thermal transfer that much?
 

Bare copper is fairly chemical stable, as long as no larger amounts of hydrogen sulphide are present in the atmosphere. Many electrical parts, e.g. bus bars have a bare copper surface. It's not so good for electronical parts because oxidized copper can't be soldered easily.

For better chemical stability, you can apply e.g. electrolytical tin plating. But if the copper surface is glued to the heatsink, I don't see any problem with bare copper surfaces.

A regular PCB doesn't expose bare copper unless the manufacturer omits the standard surface finish. May be available on special order, but I don't see why you won't want to use standard surfaces.
 
FvM
But if the copper surface is glued to the heatsink, I don't see any problem with bare copper surfaces.

.....so would you say that for a PCB thats going to be glued to an aluminium heatsink, it is completely pointless to get the bottom copper layer covered in solder resist?
(the bottom copper layer being the layer thats going to be glued to the heatsink)

(By the way , the bottom copper layer is electrically isolated from any electrical power or signals in the circuit)
 
Last edited:

for a PCB thats going to be glued to an aluminium heatsink, it is completely pointless to get the bottom copper layer covered in solder resist?
Yes. In addition, solder mask is slightly increasing the thermal resistance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top