Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[SOLVED] Passive vs Active Mixers

Status
Not open for further replies.

rfndmw

Member level 4
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
74
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,858
Hi,

In an application note for mixer parameters from Maxim, it is mentioned that:

"A major advantage of passive mixers is that they can also be used as frequency upconverters."

The link for the application note is: **broken link removed**

Does it mean that active mixers have some disadvantage when used as up converters?
 

Hi Miguel,

Thanks for the reply. If this is case, then practically, are active up converters never employed?? If they are then are there any specific applications for which they are preferred?
 

When the active mixer noise is not important in your system.
And the active mixer can give you signal gain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rfndmw

    rfndmw

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Thanks for the replies.

@ Thannara: If the link is not working please follow this on the maxim website:

Maxim > App Notes > Basestations/wireless infrastructure Communications circuits Wireless and RF
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top