Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Optional antenna placement

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bsr

Newbie level 5
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
10
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Location
india
Activity points
105
Hi ,


I'm planning to place two antenna's UFL and SMA supported on my RF board . among them one is optional for a particular time. So , I've two different approaches or placement methods , one is T-Network method and the other is Y-Junction method .
Can anyone please mention which one is the best approach when i'm transmitting through that antennas. WhatsApp Image 2019-03-27 at 14.55.16.jpeg
 

What is operation frequency? I imagine SMA-connector may be matched to to look like half-wavelength open-stub resonator to minimize mismatch if frequency is pretty high.
Really not sure what is Y-junction and how it differs from T-junction in your case, by pcb lines shape? On your image there are gaps and three ports have no connection.
I would use nice tiny SPDT chip, something like: https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/196/Infineon-BGS12PL6-DS-v02_05-EN-1226065.pdf
 
The operational frequency is around 1GHz , Thanks for the suggestion about switch usage , But here I don't want to use the switch that's why I came across these options .

Where The difference between the T-junction and Y- junction are in the layout pcb lines only.
If I considered the T-junction, Let's say I have shorted the UFL antenna path as conducting path for RF line , Is there any chance of leakage of Transmission power from the other end of T-network in SMA path. (I'm expecting, we will arrive with some transmission power loss ) , can we mitigate that transmission loss with Y-junction placement ?
 

It's not clear what's the actual difference between both drawings. So I'll answer differently.

I presume both involves a jumper, e.g. a 0-ohm resistor chip. The best solution has the least transmission line discontinuity and no open stub. Or the discontinuities must be compensated in the already used impedance matching.

There's no real problem at 1 GHz.
 

Are both antennas operating at the same frequency? If so, wouldn't the power split evenly if your antenna impedances (50 Ohms) are the same? Without some sort of switching element, it seems both antennas will be energized at all times.
 

place ufl connector on the trace which will reduce the extra stub. there is one Microwave Coaxial Connectors with Switch available with ufl size .
The internally built-in mechanical switch separates the RF circuit and ANT circuit, so that the circuit can be measured without any mutual effect using a dedicated probe madeby Murata. Except when measuring with probe, internal mechanical switch is connected, so RF circuit and Antennacircuit are connected.
https://www.digikey.in/product-deta...-america/MM8430-2610RA1/490-4980-1-ND/1775924
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top