salvo rtos avr source
>How can I prove it?
It's simply. Disassemble both , and fined same functions.
>I can't. I just looked into the structure of "jacOS" and immediately remembered Salvo. Everything is the
>same. Functions, parameters, notation etc.etc.etc.
And in uC/OS-II the same. It's not an argument.
>There are some changes, thought. But all of them could be just minor cosmetic changes designed to
>hide the original product.
jacOS gives about 40-50% more compact kernel code. Also it works in average 50% faster (sometimes 5-6 times faster).
>The last argument could be the library list for different types of MCUs. It is identical to the Salvo's!
>Can anyone design a RTOS and produce a library with the same file names for about 30 MCUs?
> I don't think so.
It's not an argument too. Compare librarys for PIC16F873:
pic412dc.lib - HT PICC
412dtu.lib - jacOS
sfp412ab.lib - Salvo
>But if (though I doubt it) "jacOS" is a truly original product I apologise profusely for my mistake .