Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Natural Convection Heatsink for 80W power dissipation?

Magnethicc

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Messages
20
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
3
Activity points
263
Hi guys,
Does anyone have experience with convection cooled heatsinks for a power dissipation of around 80W?
We are looking for a design of such heatsink and we came up with a vertical fins stretching from the bottom to the top and was wondering if there is a better design.

This is a top view of the heatsink.
1656569639552.png


Thank you for your replys.
 

wwfeldman

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
1,014
Helped
217
Reputation
433
Reaction score
264
Trophy points
83
Activity points
7,655
it looks like there are 6 dissipating devices on each heat sink
if you are using natural convection, there needs to be space above and below so the air is free to flow naturally.

the manufacturer of the heat sink should specify how much area each dissipating device needs to
get the specified thermal resistance. power dissipated = thermal resistance x temperature difference
between two sides of heat sink - hot side, with mounted dissapaters and cold side, where the air flows.

 

crutschow

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
4,129
Helped
957
Reputation
1,912
Reaction score
997
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Colorado USA Zulu -7
Activity points
23,398
There needs to be free air flow around the sink and, if it's in a container, that also has to have large openings to allow the heat to escape.
The heat sink size will also depend upon the highest ambient temperature it will see.
 

andre_luis

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
9,392
Helped
1,174
Reputation
2,367
Reaction score
1,166
Trophy points
1,403
Location
Brazil
Activity points
54,647
Grossly speaking, you could represent the isotherm shape of the steady air around the heatsink built with narrow blades, as a flattened surface with a quite smaller area compared to the current heatsink geometry; the smaller the gap, the smaller the effective surface. This happens because the air in the deepest regions warms cumulatively without sufficient time to spread out. The following illustrations shows in the red curve a sketch of what is be the effective surface of a heatsink originaly made for forced air, but being used fanless.

Heatsink.png


So, in short, there are heatsinks suited to either work exclusivelly with or without forced air, and form the aspect ratio of the blades of the one you have, at first sight seems not adequate to work with natural convection.
 
Last edited:

Easy peasy

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
3,912
Helped
1,257
Reputation
2,514
Reaction score
1,511
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Melbourne
Activity points
22,211
you need to state the total dimensions and the max ambient air temp - also the ability for free air to convect up through and away from the top of the heatsink

adding a fan to a smaller finned heatsink can increase efficacy markedly.
 

dick_freebird

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
7,841
Helped
2,228
Reputation
4,464
Reaction score
2,176
Trophy points
1,393
Location
USA
Activity points
62,845
I'd put the fins facing outward and transistors in the
middle. Get more / better air that way, not throwing
heat at each other. And potentially not suspended
over an airflow-blocking PCB plane.
 

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top