Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Most accurate Setup and hold in each corner

Status
Not open for further replies.

feel_on_on

Full Member level 5
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
283
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,208
Most accurate : setup and hold in each corner:separate calculated
OCV libraries

set_operating_conditions
-analysis_type on_chip_variation
-max_lib WORST_LIB
-max WORST_OC
-min_lib WORST_LIB_OCV_min
-min WORST_OCV_min


Why is it the Most accurate OCV set?

If chip worked at best operation condition,It should use best min library and best max library for timing analyze.If you use two library ,best max library and worst min library for OCV timing analyze, is it accurate?
 

Hi ..

If I understood correctly, the doubt is that whether best-min-lib + best-max-lib combo would be more accurate or best-max-lib+worst-min-lib combo for timing-analysis in OCV mode for best_case operating condition ??

If this is the case, during On-Chip-Variation mode the clock path and data path are derated in different directions so as to achieve/create a more pessimistic case. So for timing analysis of best_case_operating condition, the motive would be to make the data path faster + clock path slower, consequently, the preferred case would be to pick up worst-min-lib for data path and best-max-lib for clock path.

In conclusion, yes, it would be more accurate to use combination of best-max + worst-min libraries.

Please correct me if you feel contrary ..

Cheers,
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top