Externet
Advanced Member level 2
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2004
- Messages
- 586
- Helped
- 28
- Reputation
- 58
- Reaction score
- 30
- Trophy points
- 1,308
- Location
- Mideast US
- Activity points
- 5,781
Greetings.
Very high tension transmission lines do not need to be made of copper as the cost would be prohibitive and also, at very high voltages, the current can be reduced to convey a given power. For the reduced current and increased voltage, conductors can be a more resistive aluminium, and much thinner.
That is the picture I always had since learned day one.
A conductor made of iron as the mechanical-strength reinforcing core used in high tension overhead aluminium transmission lines also conducts reasonably well if its length is not abused... I think.
Can anyone confirm if this is reasonable or flawed ?
For a million Volts; 10,000 Amperes, is an iron conductor too bad for a 10 metres length to a point it is not to consider instead of copper ?
Very high tension transmission lines do not need to be made of copper as the cost would be prohibitive and also, at very high voltages, the current can be reduced to convey a given power. For the reduced current and increased voltage, conductors can be a more resistive aluminium, and much thinner.
That is the picture I always had since learned day one.
A conductor made of iron as the mechanical-strength reinforcing core used in high tension overhead aluminium transmission lines also conducts reasonably well if its length is not abused... I think.
Can anyone confirm if this is reasonable or flawed ?
For a million Volts; 10,000 Amperes, is an iron conductor too bad for a 10 metres length to a point it is not to consider instead of copper ?