Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

ICP1 Simulation in Cadence gives wrong results

Status
Not open for further replies.

norrin

Newbie level 2
Newbie level 2
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
2
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Visit site
Activity points
1,306
hi,

i'm designing a rf-power-amplifier and i want to get the CP1 depending on the output impedance of my amplifier. so i did a pss hb sweep over my input power. when i do this simulation and vary my output impedance manually for every simulation i get correct results for my CP1. but when i put a variable for the load impedance into my port at the amplifiers output and do a parametric sweep over the output impedance variable together with the pss hb simulation, i get CP1 values which are much higher than those i get when i vary the output impedance manually. the CP1 values also rise together with my impedance but at some maximum the CP1 should drop when i increase my output impedance. but it doesn't.
why isn't a pss hb simulation not working with a paramtric sweep for a port impedance?
it also doesn't work when i sweep my output impedance of my output port as a second sweep in the pss hb simulation.
i plot the CP1 curves for the output "PORT(fixed R)". is cadence perhabs not able to see the variation of the impedance when my variable is in a port that i choose to plot the results for?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top