Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

How does Maple differ from Metlab?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lord Loh.

Full Member level 4
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
196
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Location
Texas
Activity points
1,950
Maple and Metlab?

I just read about Maple 10 in IEEE spectruma nd was wondering how Maple is different from Metlab... What are the two softwares used for?
 

manasiri

Member level 5
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Messages
92
Helped
13
Reputation
26
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
2,304
Maple and Metlab?

Dear Lord

the MATLAB is one of the best simulation and modelling and programming software also have extended toolboxes and simulation environments.

maple is for calculus purposes not for programing.

I think MATLAB is better than for all problems except for rapig calculations.

regards
 

kordix

Member level 3
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
58
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,825
Maple and Metlab?

You have to know that matlab integrates the Maple kernel. Indeed, you can perform maple functions under matlab, just type:

MAPLE('function',ARG1,ARG2,..,)

to view the help on this function, type:
help maple
 

v_c

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
514
Helped
113
Reputation
226
Reaction score
37
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Activity points
8,229
Re: Maple and Metlab?

Matlab is best suited for doing numerical calcuations (although it can do symbolic as well if you have some toolboxes installed). It is geared toward block diagram based system and is ideal for signal processing, control systems and algorithm development for these.

Maple is an excellent symbolic mathematics package. It can do numerical as well but its strength is in symbolic mathematical manipulation of all types.
 

Lord Loh.

Full Member level 4
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
196
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Location
Texas
Activity points
1,950
Maple and Metlab?

This "help Maple" does not seem to work on Scilab 3.1.1 ?
 

anto2

Member level 3
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
56
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
531
Re: Maple and Metlab?

i'm not surprised, matlab is not scilab and scilab is not matlab. Anyway with regard to the maple vs matlab discussion, matlab is more useful for Engineers, maple is more useful for mathematician since maple is capable of outputing actual formulas whereas matlab is limited to numerical values. however matlab is more powerful in terms of analysing data, which maple cannot do. Another application of note is mathcad, which I find very useful. It also can do data processing, however it is not as flexible and powerful as matlab, and it cannot return equations similar to those returned from maple. the main advantage of mathcad is that you do not have to learn sytax, if you ever did any significant engineering mathematics course then you would love this due to the "what you see is what you get" nature of the program.
hope this helps.
 

matchasm

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
21
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,545
Re: Maple and Matlab?

It is often said that Maple is for symbolic calculation what Matlab is to numerical calculation.

I do not agree with this view. First of all, Matlab has a huge package of toolboxes to suit the engineer, which is far beyond Maple. Designing filters, even exotic sigma-deltas, is really easy in Matlab. Although some people like it more than I do, Simulink can sometimes make this a little easier still.

Maple has only a limited application range, in my opinion. Quick symbolic calculations and even writing short programs can be done in Maple, but as soon as it becomes serious, people will revert again to Matlab for elaborate numerical analysis and to Mathematica for in-depth symbolic analysis.

An additional reason why I don't like Maple, is that it is full of bugs, mostly related to convergence. Once I tried drawing a simple Monte Carlo plot, and Maple would refuse to get the axis definitions right due to some program fault. So even the graphical options, for which Maple is sometimes acclaimed (especially when people see vector plots or animations), are not as solid as one would hope.
 

Sal

Full Member level 4
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
237
Helped
52
Reputation
104
Reaction score
13
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,034
Maple and Metlab?

Yeah, with Matlab you can do almost everything you do with Maple, The ploblem with Matlab is that it doesnt display the results as Maple does. Besides that Maple has some implemented functions not included in Matlab

Sal
 

kordix

Member level 3
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
58
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,825
Maple and Metlab?

another remark:
v_c said :
"Maple is an excellent symbolic mathematics package"

that is absolutely right!!

matshasm said:
"Maple has only a limited application range, in my opinion."

well, give an example and we'll see!
but,"it is full of bugs, mostly related to convergence", that's right but always depending on what version u re running.

to Lord Loh.,
if u re trying to do with scilab or octave what u do with maple, check if there is syhing like th "symbolic toolbox" in Matlab. If yes, the big problem is resolved.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top