Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

highly lossy materials in CST MWS

Status
Not open for further replies.

noob

Newbie level 3
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,327
Hello all,

why is it that CST MWS cannot simulate materials that have tand>1?I cannot think of any explaination, do you have any suggestions?Is this a kind of limitation common to EM solvers?

If the tand is not much more than unity, then I use 0.99 as the value. But in the case of ferrites, the tand is around 30 (!!!). Any way round this problem?Or is it just impossible?

Thanks for reading

noob
 

let me give a brief reply. Good conductor is difficult to simulate with FDTD type solver because 1.you need extremely small mesh inside the conductor if you apply the same updating formula as in a lossless dielectric and low-loss material. To understand this, you just need to compute the wavelength inside the conductor using the complex epsilon; 2. a good conductor is very dispersive than low-loss material. again you only need to examine the propagation constant as function of frequency to see this. Consequently, it is difficult to obtain a wide-band source because the mode at the port is likewise very dispersive.

Frequency domain solvers are better in handling loss in good conductor. but you also need fine mesh to get accurate answer.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top