Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Hierarchical extraction with Assura: "Conflict between symbol and ...."

Status
Not open for further replies.

gabrielbertotti

Newbie level 3
Newbie level 3
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Berlin
Visit site
Activity points
1,341
Hi everybody,

I'm trying to simulate the effects of my layout routing from the pads to the core of a mixed-signal ASIC.
My idea was to hierarchical extract the whole layout and then simulate the connection parasitics with the
subcells at schematic/functional level to make the process faster. (For some reasons the pads are few
millimeters away from the core and DC currents play an important role so I'd like to estimate the voltage drop)
I managed to do the extraction using Assura LVS with ?preserveParameters and QRC with HRCX and for every
subcell the option "+ netlist=none": looking at the hierachical tree of the extracted view everything looks fine
and the config view for the test bench is also created without any problem.
However when I try to netlist with ADE L (Spectre) I got for every subcell the following error:

Netlist Error: Conflict between symbol view and schematic view of instance "DIGITAL" in cell-view "ext_a_WORKBENCHES_NCG" "NCG_22um_Chip_rcx" "analog_extracted_RCH_array"

where DIGITAL is e.g. one of the subcells and ext_a_WORKBENCHES_NCG is the library created by HRCX, which contains "NCG_22um_Chip_rcx".
I checked all CDF information of all cells in the main library (WORKBENCHES_NCG) and didn't find any uncongruence as well as I tryed to repeat the same
procedure with a simpler circuit (inverter + routing + pad), but I cannot figure out where the problem could be.
Is there any way to look into the subcircuits definitions (term order and so on) that are create by HRCX/contained
in any extracted view?

I'll be gratefull for any hint or suggestion,
thanks in advance

Gabriel
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top