andrewgfd
Newbie level 4
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2014
- Messages
- 5
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 1
- Activity points
- 52
Hi guys and girls. Not sure if you can help. I am trying to build a fader start for a dual CD player (Denon 2600) so that when I push a fader up on an audio mixer the CD starts to play. I have had some success with this project so far in that I can remote start each of the players individually, however, when I connect both up to the mixer remote control, pushing up one fader starts both CD players. I suspect it may be a ground issue?
The details. The mixer (Sonifex S1) has outputs for the remotes, sending a signal for each fader movement - mixer details from manual pasted below:
Start Function: This sets whether the Start function is continuous (remains active) or momentary (active for a approximately half a second). Uses Transistor Pull Down Signal Inverters.
Example pin-out
Pin 19: Channel 8 Input 1 Stop
Pin 20: Channel 8 Input 2 Stop
Pin 21: Channel 9 Input 1 Start
Pin 22: Channel 9 Input 2 Start
Pin 23: DGND
I have taken the output of these faders, eg a start pulse and DGND and connected them to a small relay circuit (**broken link removed**), that drives a relay on a 'push button' contact, and the relay starts the CD player. As I said, if just one fader and one relay board are connected - either one - it works great. It even works great with both relay boards are connected to the CD player and I manually close the contacts instead of passing the wires through the mixer. With both relay boards connected to the mixer, depending on how I have the wires connected, one fader start either triggers both relays simultaneously (and starting both CD decks), or each fader only ever controls one relay (and the other is idol).
I have measured and checked the output of the mixer, and in all circumstances the expected output happens when either fader is open - a short contact closure between the start and DGND. Double checked all the wiring etc. and all checks out.
I'm not to clued up on these things, but it could be some kind of earth/ground issue where having both connected somehow the signal, and it is beyond my knowledge how to resolve it.
Bit of a long shot, but if you have any thoughts or ideas on how I could solve this I would be so grateful.
Many thanks,
Andrew.
The details. The mixer (Sonifex S1) has outputs for the remotes, sending a signal for each fader movement - mixer details from manual pasted below:
Start Function: This sets whether the Start function is continuous (remains active) or momentary (active for a approximately half a second). Uses Transistor Pull Down Signal Inverters.
Example pin-out
Pin 19: Channel 8 Input 1 Stop
Pin 20: Channel 8 Input 2 Stop
Pin 21: Channel 9 Input 1 Start
Pin 22: Channel 9 Input 2 Start
Pin 23: DGND
I have taken the output of these faders, eg a start pulse and DGND and connected them to a small relay circuit (**broken link removed**), that drives a relay on a 'push button' contact, and the relay starts the CD player. As I said, if just one fader and one relay board are connected - either one - it works great. It even works great with both relay boards are connected to the CD player and I manually close the contacts instead of passing the wires through the mixer. With both relay boards connected to the mixer, depending on how I have the wires connected, one fader start either triggers both relays simultaneously (and starting both CD decks), or each fader only ever controls one relay (and the other is idol).
I have measured and checked the output of the mixer, and in all circumstances the expected output happens when either fader is open - a short contact closure between the start and DGND. Double checked all the wiring etc. and all checks out.
I'm not to clued up on these things, but it could be some kind of earth/ground issue where having both connected somehow the signal, and it is beyond my knowledge how to resolve it.
Bit of a long shot, but if you have any thoughts or ideas on how I could solve this I would be so grateful.
Many thanks,
Andrew.