Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

CST Transient, Frequency and Integral Solver Different Results

Status
Not open for further replies.

hkdurrani18

Newbie level 3
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,330
Hello,

I am simulating a small satellite body (60x60x50) cm, with two CP square patch antenna's. I am interested in the combined pattern of the antenna's with the satellite body. Earlier i was using Transient Solver to simulate the body and the results were okish (Combined Gain = 7 dB).

A friend of mine told me that for better results I should go for either Integral or Frequency solver, so i tried both of them, now the thing is that the combined results of all three solvers are completely different... I achieved a gain of (4 dB at PHI=0) in the case of frequency solver and (6.7 dB at PHI=0) in Integral solver..... Apart from Gain Combined Patterns are completely different from each other :(

So now i am confused as to which solver to use and which results are accurate :/ ... Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated ... Thank you.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top