sabucheeru27@gmail.com
Newbie level 5
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 10
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 1,281
- Location
- bangalore
- Activity points
- 1,365
Hi all,
I'm doing logical equivalence check between
1)RTL n MBIST inserted NETLIST
2)PLAIN NETLIST without MBIST n DFT stuffs vs MBIST inserted NETLIST
TEST_MODE is a top level pin of my design which when 0 makes the design in pure functional mode.My design is very complex and I'm moving with hierarchial comparison.So dpends on tool generated script.My issue is in the revised netlist there are many registers extra..which are the output ports of internal modules.So when i did
add pin constraints 0 TEST_MODE -revised
write hier dofile LEC.do -constraint -noexact -replace
since golden has no mbist cells many internal modules are skipped from hierarchial script(dofile).And when compared at the higher hierarchy of design it gave me many non equivalent points.So that the TEST_MODE 0 value cant be propagated.Please if anyone knows the solution please do reply
Please help,i'm in the critical stage of the project.
I'm doing logical equivalence check between
1)RTL n MBIST inserted NETLIST
2)PLAIN NETLIST without MBIST n DFT stuffs vs MBIST inserted NETLIST
TEST_MODE is a top level pin of my design which when 0 makes the design in pure functional mode.My design is very complex and I'm moving with hierarchial comparison.So dpends on tool generated script.My issue is in the revised netlist there are many registers extra..which are the output ports of internal modules.So when i did
add pin constraints 0 TEST_MODE -revised
write hier dofile LEC.do -constraint -noexact -replace
since golden has no mbist cells many internal modules are skipped from hierarchial script(dofile).And when compared at the higher hierarchy of design it gave me many non equivalent points.So that the TEST_MODE 0 value cant be propagated.Please if anyone knows the solution please do reply
Please help,i'm in the critical stage of the project.